Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 84 | Unknown | — | |
| 2018 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 78 | Unknown | — | |
| 2017 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 82 | Unknown | — | |
| 2016 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 86 | Unknown | — | |
| 2015 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 76 | Unknown | — | |
| 2014 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 89 | Unknown | — | |
| 2013 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 76 | Unknown | — | |
| 2012 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 75 | Unknown | — | |
| 2011 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.0% | 85 | Unknown | — |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2019
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 12.0% of Rev |
Tax year 2018
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 7.4% of Rev |
Tax year 2017
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 14.2% of Rev |
Tax year 2016
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 8.7% of Rev |
Tax year 2015
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 13.0% of Rev |
Tax year 2014
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 5.5% of Rev |
Tax year 2013
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 9.2% of Rev |
Tax year 2012
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 8.1% of Rev |
Tax year 2011
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XML Data Pending | Top Officer (Est.) | 13.1% of Rev |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 37 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 40 points below the peer median (0 vs. 40).
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
Overall score has gone from 76 → 84 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 12.0% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.