Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 46 Fragile Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 48 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SANDRA EMILE Board President
WENDY WIMMER Board President
FRANK COPPIN Treasurer
RYAN LINDSEY Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SANDRA EMILE Board President
WENDY WIMMER Vice President
FRANK COPPIN Treasurer
RYAN LINDSEY Secretary
SANDRA EMILE Board President
WENDY WIMMER Board President
FRANK COPPIN Treasurer
RYAN LINDSEY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 40 points below the peer median (5 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.