Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 36 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 64 | Stable | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 65 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 65 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRISTINE YOM | Board President | — | ||
| JACKIE SIFFORD JOYNER | Board President | — | ||
| CARO GIORDANO | Secretary | — | ||
| LEON BORDEN | Treasurer | — | ||
| CHRISTINE DEGUISEPPI | Board Member | — | ||
| JOESPH RUSSO | Board Member | — | ||
| REBECCA KIM | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurie Kenagy | Board President | — | ||
| Jackie Sifford Joyner | Board President | — | ||
| Hilary Brown | Secretary | — | ||
| Leon Borden | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 183 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (10 vs. 51).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.