Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 27.9% 50 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Asok Motayed Board President
Mishka Mukherji Artistic Director
Malini Appalla Secretary
Paroma Sanyal Treasurer
Arunima Ghosh Board Member
Jayshree Murthy Board Member
Sukanya Mukherji Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Asok Motayed Board President
Mishka Mukherji Artistic Director
Malini Appalla Secretary
Paroma Sanyal Treasurer
Arunima Ghosh Board Member
Jayshree Murthy Board Member
Sukanya Mukherji Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mishka Mukherji Artistic Director 6.8% of Rev
Angelica Mukherjee Teacher 1.3% of Rev
Sukanya Mukherji Artistic Director 1.2% of Rev
Asok Motayed Board President
Malini Appalla Secretary
Paroma Sanyal Treasurer
Arunima Ghosh Board Member
Jayshree Murthy Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 115 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 46 points below the peer median (30 vs. 76).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.