Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 57.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 49 Fragile Recovery
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETH DECOUX Board President
CJ BRASE Board President
JAN TIPPETT Secretary
SUE TUMA Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CJ BRASE Board President
CJ BRASE Board President
MARLENE CAMILL Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CJ BRASE Board President
PATRICIA BRAAS Board President
KRISTIN WAREHI Secretary
MARLENE CAMILL Treasurer
LES ABRAHAM Board Member
BETH DECOUX Board Member
TOM LANGE Board Member
ANITA MEYER Board Member
CJ BRASE Board President
PATRICIA BRAAS Board President
KRISTIN WAREHI Secretary
MARLENE CAMILL Treasurer
LES ABRAHAM Board Member
BETH DECOUX Board Member
TOM LANGE Board Member
ANITA MEYER Board Member
SUE TUMA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 257 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 11 points below the peer median (50 vs. 61).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.