Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 13.8% 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 13.8% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 25.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 14.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 15.0% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 56 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANET B KALTENBACH Executive Director 13.1% of Rev
WILLIAM H vonREICHBAUER Board President
MARY BUCKLE SEARLE Board President
ROBERT M CONROY Treasurer
LINDA SMITH Secretary
SIGNE G BOWLING N/A
ROBIN D BALILES EMERITA, NON-VOTING
J THOMAS BROWN N/A
JOHANNA BANKS CHASE EMERITA NON-VOTING
SCOTT COLLEY N/A
PATRICIA DAVIS EMERITA NON-VOTING
ROBERT L ELLIOTT EMERITUS NON-VOTING
CHARLES M GRISHAM N/A
KELLY SULICK EX-OFFICIO
KARL HAGSTROM MILLER N/A
KAY C PARKER N/A
ROSALYN PRESTON N/A
BENJAMIN W ROUS EX-OFFICIO
LEILA SHENKIR N/A
CARY TURNER N/A
RICHARD WILL N/A

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANET B KALTENBACH Executive Director 13.1% of Rev
WILLIAM H vonREICHBAUER Board President
MARY BUCKLE SEARLE Board President
ROBERT M CONROY Treasurer
LINDA SMITH Secretary
ROBIN D BALILES EMERITA, NON-VOTING
J THOMAS BROWN N/A
JOHANNA CHASE EMERITA NON-VOTING
SCOTT COLLEY N/A
PATRICIA DAVIS EMERITA NON-VOTING
ROBERT L ELLIOTT EMERITUS NON-VOTING
CHARLES M GRISHAM N/A
KARL HAGSTROM MILLER N/A
KAY C PARKER N/A
BENJAMIN W ROUS N/A
LEILA SHENKIR N/A
KELLY SULICK N/A
CHARLES H TURNER N/A
RICHARD WILL N/A
GEORGE K YIN N/A
SIGNE G BOWLING N/A

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet B Kaltenbach Executive Director 13.0% of Rev
Leila S Shenkir Board President
William von Reichbauer Board President
Robert M Conroy Treasurer
Linda Smith Secretary
Robin D Baliles Emerita
Signe G Bowling Unspecified Role
J Thonas Brown Unspecified Role
Johanna Banks Chase Emerita
Scott Colley Unspecified Role
Carol Burkhardt Cooper Unspecified Role
Patricia Davis Emerita
Robert Elliott Emeritus
Charles M Grisham Unspecified Role
Mark Metcalf Unspecified Role
Karl Hagstrom Miller Unspecified Role
Kay C Parker Unspecified Role
Kelly Peral Unspecified Role
Benjamin Rous Unspecified Role
Anne Y Sartori Unspecified Role
Mary Buckle Searle Unspecified Role
Katy Sinclair Unspecified Role
Charles N Turner Unspecified Role
Richard Will Unspecified Role
George K Yin Unspecified Role
Melissa A young Unspecified Role
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 242 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 42 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.