Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
28
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence Mastri Board Member
Peter Trofimenko Artistic Director
Terri Lukach Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence Mastri Board Member
Peter Trofimenko Artistic Director
Terri Lukach Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence Mastri Board Member
Peter Trofimenko Artistic Director
Terri Lukach Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 243 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (15 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.