Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 56 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOUGLAS J STUSSI Board President
CHARLES E WIGGIN Board President
LOUISE CLEARY CANNON Treasurer
PENNY M MCCALEB Secretary
STEVEN C AGEE Board Member
PATRICK B ALEXANDER Board Member
J EDWARD BARTH Board Member
L JOE BRADLEY Board Member
TERESA COOPER Board Member
PAUL DUDMAN Board Member
MISCHA GORKUSCHA Board Member
JANE B HARLOW Board Member
BRENT HART Board Member
JEAN A HARTSUCK Board Member
MICHAEL E JOSEPH Board Member
HARRISON LEVY JR Board Member
DUKE R LIGON Board Member
JESSICA MARTINEZ-BROOKS Board Member
MICHAEL J MILLIGAN Board Member
ALICE PIPPIN Board Member
ERIK SALAZAR Board Member
JEFF STARLING Board Member
JEROD TATE Board Member
RICHARD TANENBAUM Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOUGLAS J STUSSI Board President
CHARLES E WIGGIN Board President
LOUISE CLEARY CANNON Treasurer
PENNY M MCCALEB Secretary
STEVEN C AGEE Board Member
PATRICK B ALEXANDER Board Member
J EDWARD BARTH Board Member
L JOE BRADLEY Board Member
TERESA COOPER Board Member
TA DEARMON Board Member
PAUL DUDMAN Board Member
THOMAS J ENIS Board Member
MISCHA GORKUSCHA Board Member
JANE B HARLOW Board Member
BRENT HART Board Member
JEAN A HARTSUCK Board Member
MICHAEL E JOSEPH Board Member
HARRISON LEVY JR Board Member
DUKE R LIGON Board Member
JESSICA MARTINEZ-BROOKS Board Member
MICHAEL J MILLIGAN Board Member
ALICE PIPPIN Board Member
JEFF STARLING Board Member
RICHARD TANENBAUM Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL E JOSEPH Board President
JEAN A HARTSUCK Board President
DOUGLAS J STUSSI Treasurer
PENNY M MCCALEB Secretary
STEVEN C AGEE Board Member
PATRICK B ALEXANDER Board Member
J EDWARD BARTH Board Member
L JOE BRADLEY Board Member
TERESA COOPER Board Member
TA DEARMON Board Member
PAUL DUDMAN Board Member
THOMAS J ENIS Board Member
MISCHA GORKUSCHA Board Member
JANE B HARLOW Board Member
BRENT HART Board Member
HARRISON LEVY JR Board Member
DUKE R LIGON Board Member
MICHAEL J MILLIGAN Board Member
RICHARD L SIAS Board Member
RICHARD TANENBAUM Board Member
CHARLES E WIGGIN Board Member
LOUISE CLEARY CANNON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 94 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.