Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 64 Stable Stable Watch
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2020 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 57 Fragile Recovery
2015 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 57 Fragile Recovery
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wayne Vandenberg Board President
Marlene Thurman Board President
Marianne Cruikshank Art Work
Hank Thode Historian
Susan Kelton Secretary
Dale Thurman Treasurer
Dick Anderson Data
Tim Phillips Board Member
Michael Barbee Emarketing
Carolyn Childerston Hospitality
Tim Webb Board Member
Fred Garcia Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 270 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points above the peer median (100 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.