Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 49 Fragile Recovery
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chris Miller Board Member
Erik Niemeyer Treasurer
Sharon Affinati Board President
Priscilla Swanson Board Member
Candace Carson Board President
Jackie Oros Secretary
Keith Miller Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gail Sovick Board President
Pidge Carlisle Board Member
Kristyn Neimeyer Treasurer
Danni Wattles Board Member
Bev Jordi Board Member
Renata Seick Board Member
Sooner McCay Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kim Eastman Board President
Michael Chiappini Board Member
September Sack Board President
Jeff Taylor Board Member
MJ Schauer Board Member
Cindy Czarnick Treasurer
Jeffery Erwin Secretary
Spencer Musser Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 138 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.