Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
27
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 6.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 14.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLA THOMPSON Executive Director 13.8% of Rev
JAKORY TAYLOR Board Member
MARGRET WALKER Board Member
CRYSTAL TURPIN Board Member
JACKIE ARMINGTON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points below the peer median (5 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 27 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.