Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 30.0% | 30 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | 15.1% | 30 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARVEY LOCKHART | Executive Director | 39.3% of Rev | ||
| LYNELL BOYD | Treasurer | — | ||
| KIM AUSMER | Board President | — | ||
| NICHOL GORDON | Secretary | — | ||
| DAVE CASTRO | Board Member | — | ||
| JADE HALBERT | Board Member | — | ||
| DON COOK | Board Member | — | ||
| CARLTON ADAMS | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARVEY LOCKHART | Executive Director | 11.5% of Rev | ||
| HARVEY LOCKHART | Executive Director | 6.2% of Rev | ||
| DON COOK | Secretary | — | ||
| THOMAS SILER | Board President | — | ||
| DIANA HASKEL | Secretary | — | ||
| DON COOK | Secretary | — | ||
| RITA GOLIAY | Treasurer | — | ||
| DAVE CASTRO | Board Member | — | ||
| NICHOL GORDON | Board Member | — | ||
| KIMBERLY AUSMER | Board Member | — | ||
| DR JADE HALBERT | Board Member | — | ||
| ROCHELLE WALKER | Board Member | — | ||
| DAVE CASTRO | Board Member | — | ||
| NICHOL GORDON | Board Member | — | ||
| KIMBERLY AUSMER | Board Member | — | ||
| DIANA HASKEL | Secretary | — | ||
| THOMAS SILER | Board President | — | ||
| RITA GOLIAY | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 93 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points below the peer median (20 vs. 65).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.