Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 46 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICK ABOTT | Board President | — | ||
| JULIE SHAMBARGER | CHAIRPERSONMANAGER | — | ||
| TAMMY WILLIAMS | Secretary | — | ||
| JIM MULLIGAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| CINDY MCLOCHLIN | Board Member | — | ||
| RANDY SUTTON | Board Member | — | ||
| KRISTIN B WOLFE | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAMMY WILLIAMS | Secretary | — | ||
| KIM BENZING | Treasurer | — | ||
| TERRY LEE | Board President | — | ||
| JULIE SHAMBARGER | Board President | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHYLLIS DAUSMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| AYN R FRENGER | CHAIRMAN | — | ||
| TERRY LEE | Board Member | — | ||
| JULIE SHAMBARGER | Secretary | — | ||
| JENNIFER WEINERT | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 181 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 12 points below the peer median (50 vs. 62).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.