Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REBECCA GATT Board President
WILLIAM BELL VICE PRESIDE
BETHANY WALKER Treasurer
ROSEMARY MORRIS Board Member
KIMBERLEY FRASHER Secretary
MARTHA DITTO Board Member
KALIE LINDSEY Board Member
AMBER RAINEY Board Member
SHANNON SKARKA Board Member
REBEKAH ZEERIP Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KARI DURFEE Board President
REBECCA GATT VICE PRESIDE
WILLIAM BELL Secretary
TAMARA LIEBENTHAL Treasurer
ROSE MORRISS Board Member
AMBER RAINEY Board Member
MARTHA DITTO Board Member
KALIE LINDSAY Board Member
DESIREE SIMLER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTHA DITTO Board Member
KARI DURFEE VICE PRESIDE
REBECCA GATT Board Member
ELAINE GRAY Board President
GWEN LEE Secretary
TAMARA LIEBENTHAL Treasurer
KALIE LINDSAY Board Member
CARA LITTLEFIELD MANAGER
DESIREE SIMLER Board Member
DEBRA TENNAPEL CONDUCTOR
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 270 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.