Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 Hidden Hidden 234.1% 9 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 Hidden Hidden 238.5% 13 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 Hidden Hidden 67.5% 8 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 Hidden Hidden 41.0% 37 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 Hidden Hidden 52.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2010 Hidden 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.

Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 42 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 27 points below the peer median (50 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 43 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.