Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | 10.7% | 52 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | — | — | 5.7% | 50 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBERT KWALICK | EXECUTIVE DI | — | ||
| JODIANN TENNEY | Board President | — | ||
| JAMIE MARCOUX | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| BETSY COWETTE | Treasurer | — | ||
| JUDY ACHINCLOSS | Board Member | — | ||
| LORI FINEMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| ETHAN ANTONUCCI | Board Member | — | ||
| CLEVE FEUSSENICH | Board Member | — | ||
| MARK HALLORAN | Board Member | — | ||
| KEN MERZ | Board Member | — | ||
| PAUL MARCARELLI | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Kwalick | Executive Dir. | 14.4% of Rev | ||
| Kennedy Cogan | Board President | — | ||
| Cleve Fuessenich | Board President | — | ||
| Ethan Antonucci | Board President | — | ||
| Jamie Marcoux | Board Member | — | ||
| Jodiann Tenney | Secretary | — | ||
| Kenneth Merz | Board Member | — | ||
| Wendy Story | Board Member | — | ||
| Burke Gibney | Board Member | — | ||
| Mark Halloran | Board Member | — | ||
| Nadine Kim | Board Member | — | ||
| Lori Fineman | Board Member | — | ||
| Kate Karet | Board Member | — | ||
| Judy Auchincloss | Board Member | — | ||
| Betsy Cowette | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 184 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.