Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 28.0% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 57 Fragile Recovery
2015 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA RADKE BROWN EXECUTIVE DI 51.5% of Rev
KRISTEN MILLER Secretary
SHELLY WRIGHT Treasurer
WENDY BYRNES Board Member
ALAN DAVIS Board Member
LENA SIMMONS Board Member
CHARLES VICE Board President
JOHN CLOUGH VICE PRESIDE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 37 other orgs in AK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points above the peer median (80 vs. 43).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 57 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.